Wednesday, 28 February 2018

hope-hicks-resigns-jpg.jpeg

I paid off my student loans early

hope-hicks-resigns-jpg.jpeg

Getty Image

Hope Hicks, the longtime aide to Donald Trump who followed him all the way to the White House and into the communications director job previously occupied by Anthony Scaramucci for 10 days, revealed on Wednesday that she was resigning. According to the New York Times, the former model turned personal assistant to the ex-Celebrity Apprentice star made the announcement on Wednesday. Politico reports that Press Secretary Sarah Sanders subsequently confirmed the news to reporters.

Per the Times, Trump’s third communications director “had been considering leaving for several months”:

She told colleagues that she had accomplished what she felt she could with a job that made her one of the most powerful people in Washington, and that there would never be a perfect moment to leave, according to White House aides.

In a statement, Hicks expressed her gratitude to President Trump and the White House staff:

“There are no words to adequately express my gratitude to President Trump,” Hicks said in a statement provided by the White House, in which she did not say what she planned to do next. “I wish the President and his administration the very best as he continues to lead our country.”

Her resignation came a day after she “Bannoned” the House Intelligence Committee while testifying behind closed doors. Though nowhere nearly as severely as Carter Page, Paul Manafort, Rick Gates, and others with previous connections to Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, White House transition, and early administration, Hicks has been a person of interest to Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller’s ongoing probe into possible collusion with Russia. But like former Chief Strategist Steve Bannon, she apparently revealed nothing.

(Via New York Times and Politico)

do you like going to work? Me neither! See how I got around that and got paid too!



from Carlos B2 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/uproxx/features/~3/9_CQNj_LYNQ/
via carlosbastarache216.blogspot.com/

roy-moore-steve-bannon.jpg

I paid off my student loans early

roy-moore-steve-bannon.jpg

Getty Image

In the weeks following the publication of Michael Wolff’s Fire and Fury and his resulting exit from Breitbart, former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon has kept relatively quiet, popping up briefly to get interviewed by Robert Mueller. However, he claims he’s been working on something that will “weaponize ideas.” So he sat down for an interview with GQ about how the Time’s Up movement is trying to end the patriarchy.

In the interview, Bannon says he’s studying Time’s Up because he considers it the flip-side of (and a reaction to) the populist nationalist movement:

“There are two important movements in this country right now: the populist nationalist movement on the right, and the MeToo movement on the left. Excuse me, not the MeToo. It’s the Time’s Up movement. MeToo is about sexual predators and everything like that. The Time’s Up movement is much more fundamental and actually many steps above MeToo. It’s basically going against 10,000 years of recorded history. That’s the power of it. You see here something that’s in a very early, raw stage, but I’ve never seen such potential power in something.”

Bannon added that he didn’t agree with it (naturally), but he did respect it, citing the millions of marchers for the second Women’s March and the headlines it generated (“A Movement’s Vast Cadre of Foot Soldiers”):

“People say, ‘Oh, Steve, it doesn’t have any policies yet.’ It doesn’t need to have policies yet. The Tea Party didn’t have policies in its first couple of years, but it was against Obamacare. There’s plenty of power in just being against. The Five Star Movement in Italy, it’s just against, right?

“What I do know is that it’s against what I call the patriarchy, it’s against the way things have been run for the previous 4,000, 5,000, 10,000 years. It’s just opposed to that.”

He concluded the interview by saying that he is concerned with the rise of China, so it might be too late for the patriarchy.

(Via GQ)

I always thought things that sounded too good to be true usually aren't told why discovered this!



from Carlos B2 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/uproxx/features/~3/boe2gZfisSQ/
via carlosbastarache216.blogspot.com/

jeff-sessions-defends-against-trump.jpg

extra money never was this easy

jeff-sessions-defends-against-trump.jpg

Getty Image

Following the foofaraw of the Republican and Democrat memos released by the House Intelligence Committee, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that the Inspector General’s office would be investigating the alleged FISA abuses, possibly in yet another instance of Sessions trying to appease his boss who frequently berates him both publicly and privately. Of course, this did not work, as President Trump quickly tweeted how “disgraceful” it was that Sessions would do such a thing.

The current Inspector General is “an Obama guy” (as Trump complained) because he was promoted to his current job by President Obama after working at the Justice Department under both Republican and Democrat administrations. The Inspector General, while lacking prosecutorial power, can and does make routine criminal referrals to the Justice Department. The Attorney General has released a statement defending himself:

“We have initiated the appropriate process that will ensure complaints against this Department will be fully and fairly acted upon if necessary. As long as I am the Attorney General, I will continue to discharge my duties with integrity and honor, and this Department will continue to do its work in a fair and impartial manner according to the law and Constitution.”

According to CNN, Sessions may have thought Trump went too far with his latest tweet, even reportedly calling the newest insult “in the weeds,” said a Sessions source. As for Trump, he’s been sore with his attorney general ever since he recused himself from the Russia probe, setting the stage for a special counsel to be appointed.

(Via CNN)

extra money never was this easy



from Carlos B2 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/uproxx/features/~3/xMv6T0mMa4E/
via carlosbastarache216.blogspot.com/

silence-of-the-lambs.jpg

nobody knows I'm unemployed because I've got so much money

silence-of-the-lambs.jpg

Getty Image

Criterion

Coco (Disney)
The Girl Without Hands (Shout! Factory)
Lady And The Tramp (Disney)

This year’s Best Animated Feature nominees include Ferdinand and The Boss Baby suggesting that, hey, maybe this wasn’t the strongest year for American animation. But the one American stand-out on that list, Coco, almost makes up for it. Pixar’s latest is a delightful and poignant trip to the underworld via a Dia De Los Muertos story that sends a music-loving kid into the afterlife to discover some facts about his family’s history. It’s a visual delight and, whether streaming it or watching it on disc, you don’t have to watch “Olaf’s Frozen Adventure” in front of it, like most moviegoers had to do.

It’s not the only animated film worth checking out this month, either. Disney’s Lady and the Tramp makes its return from the Disney vault to delight fans of animated dogs and romantic scenes featuring pasta. Also of note: The Girl Without Hands, a handpainted adaptation of a Brothers Grimm fairy tale from Spain. The latter is part of Shout! Factory’s ongoing release of titles from GKids, a consistent source of some of the world’s most compelling animated features.

Criterion

Night of the Living Dead (Criterion)

As The Walking Dead lumbers on (and on and on) fans can be forgiven a bit of zombie fatigue. The cure for that: revisit George Romero’s Night of the Living Dead in this new edition that features a stunning restoration overseen by Romero shortly before his death. The film has circulated in tattered prints for so long it’s shocking to see how eerily artful it all is, and how breathakingly unsettling this first glimpse at the modern zombie remains. This new edition fills supplements the film with everything from a workprint cut with a different title (Night of Anubis) and a look at Romero’s early days making commercials in Pittsburgh. It’s touching to see a passionate filmmaker’s signature film finally get the respectful treatment it deserves.

Scream Factory

Drag Me To Hell (Scream Factory)

Romero had mixed luck working for major studios. Sam Raimi, who got his start with the microbudget Evil Dead films, fared much better. But he clearly missed the world from which he emerged, hence this fun-but-relentless horror movie made after completing his Spider-Man trilogy, which is receiving a well-deserved deluxe re-release. Sometimes you can go home again.

Criterion

Tom Jones (Criterion)

On the other hand, it’s occasionally OK if a director’s wishes aren’t respected. The 1963 film Tom Jones won a Best Picture Oscar for Tony Richardson thanks to its spritely, New Wave take on Henry Fielding’s classic novel of a charming young man’s bawdy adventures in 18th century England. The film made Albert Finney a star and helped prove that literary adaptations didn’t have to be so stuffy. But since 1989, per Richardson’s wishes, only a director’s cut has been available, one that sheered seven minutes from the running time and made other changes, effectively taking the version everyone fell in love with out of circulation. This new disc lets viewers decide, putting both versions side-by-side.

Arrow

Basket Case (Arrow)

There’s only one cut of Basket Case and there’s only so much a digital transfer can do to make the 1982 horror film look better than it always has, but fans of Frank Henenlotter’s cult classic would expect no less. This new edition adds an abundance of features, including a new commentary track and an old short film, sure to satisfy fans of evil twins and grody early ’80s New York locations.

The-Florida-Project

A24

Florida Project (Lionsgate)

Speaking of Oscars, Sean Baker’s funny, heartbreaking look at life on the fringes of central Florida earned a Best Supporting Actor nomination for Willem Dafoe, but it should have picked up more. Consider catching up with it your Oscar weekend assignment, if you haven’t seen it already.

I paid off my student loans early



from Carlos B2 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/uproxx/features/~3/zTPJpZTBRxg/
via carlosbastarache216.blogspot.com/

franklin.jpg

do you like going to work? Me neither! See how I got around that and got paid too!

franklin.jpg

Getty Image

Just to prove that Time’s Up can strike anywhere, Jeff Franklin, creator of the family-friendly sitcoms Full House and Fuller House, is not having his production deal renewed, and he will no longer be working on the Netflix revival, according to a statement from Warner Bros. TV. Although Franklin has not specifically been accused of sexual harassment or misconduct, complaints allege that he has a history of being “verbally abusive to staffers” and has engaged in inappropriate or sexually charged commentary in the writers’ room, including comments about his personal relationships and sex life.

According to Variety, Franklin also apparently had a habit of bringing women he dated to the Fuller House set, and would sometimes hook them up with bit parts on the show:

According to a source, Warner Bros. TV executives received an anonymous letter more than two years ago with detailed allegations about Franklin’s behavior with “Fuller House” writers and other staffers. Studio executives were warned that Franklin “was a walking lawsuit waiting to happen.” It’s not clear if Warner Bros. investigated the situation at that time. More recently, it’s understood that the studio did initiate a probe after receiving numerous complaints about Franklin’s behavior.

Amid the controversy, Netflix picked up Fuller House for a fourth season in January, although all things considered, that’s hardly a surprise.

(Via Variety)

do you like going to work? Me neither! See how I got around that and got paid too!



from Carlos B2 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/uproxx/features/~3/GHhBAt6W9Uk/
via carlosbastarache216.blogspot.com/

Luke Jedi

see how I told my boss to take this job and shove it!

Luke Jedi


Lucasfilm

Earlier this week, I was hanging out a local New York City neighborhood pub with a couple of friends and the bar started playing Return of the Jedi on one of its televisions, as this bar often does. Now, The Empire Strikes Back is my favorite movie of all time (and, this may come as a shock, my favorite Star Wars movie, too) but I may be more fascinated by Return of the Jedi, and not in a good way. It’s a movie where a lot of character decisions make almost no sense. (We’ve already been down the road that the Empire had many chances to kill the Rebels in this movie and just decided not to for some reason.) But, on this night earlier in the week, a question was asked that at the same time put everything about this movie in perspective and no one could properly answer. That question is:

If Luke’s plan to rescue Han from Jabba had worked perfectly, what would that plan have been?

Seriously, no one could answer this question. (And this wasn’t a group of Star Wars slouches either; frequent Star Wars author Jason Fry was part of this group.) So let’s kind of go through what does happen in the opening act of Return of the Jedi, character by character, and see if it makes any sense.

C-3PO and R2-D2: They are the first characters we see show up at Jabba’s palace. R2-D2 plays a recording of Luke Skywalker who states that he’d like to bargain for Han and, as a gesture of goodwill, gives Jabba C-3PO and R2-D2 as gifts. So now, right off the bat, C-3PO and R2-D2 are captured. And, yes, Luke knowing that Jabba would turn down Luke’s offer for a bargain was probably part of his plan. But I do wonder what would happen if Jabba had said, “Oh, this is a good deal. Yes, I accept these droids and you can have Han Solo.” What would Luke have done then? I think, in good faith, Luke would have had to just leave C-3PO and R2-D2 behind. And we would have gotten a scene with a forlorn Luke telling Leia, “Yeah, I really misjudged Jabba. He seems nice.”

Lando: Lando is already working as a skiff guard when Return of the Jedi opens. I’ve always wondered about his interview process. I can only assume Lando had to interview with someone higher up, like Bib Fortuna.

Bib: “So, you want to be our new skiff guard?”

Lando: “I do.”

Bib: “You look familiar.”

Lando: “Nope, I’m just a resident of Tatooine looking for a job.”

Bib: “Do you like the musical styling of the Max Rebo Band?”

Lando: “Yes.”

Bib: “Well, you’re hired. Head downstairs past the dungeon and Rancor pit and we can get you set up with a uniform and a helmet mask.”

Anyway, even though Lando is there, he doesn’t really do much until later in “the plan” except let us know he’s there.

Leia: Disguised as a bounty hunter named Boushh, Leia strolls in and hands over Chewbacca. So already three of our heroes have been captured as part of this, “Let’s just all surrender,” plan. Later that night, Leia unfreezes Han, but as they start to make their getaway, Jabba and all his friends are literally hiding behind a curtain and capture Leia and Han. (I’d watch a whole A Star Wars Story offshoot movie about Jabba planning this curtain surprise. I’d love to see him explain to Weequay, “And then we will all be super quiet and just wait there behind the curtain all night. It’s going to be great. Okay, yes, it might take a few hours, but the payoff will be worth it. We will all laugh.” I also picture Squid Head back there, “Ohhhh, I think I see someone moving. I think this is it!,” and the rest of the gang all shushing him. “Shhhhhh, Squid Head, you’re going to ruin it!”) Okay, so now, including Han, we have five heroes captured.

Luke: In now what starts to feel like a repetitive SNL sketch, Luke Skywalker is the fifth hero to stand before Jabba and start demanding the release of Solo and Chewbacca. (What is Jabba thinking at this point? I can only guess, “This has been a weird day.”) So at this point, Luke tries to use a Jedi mind trick on Jabba, to which Jabba responds, “Your mind powers will not work on me, boy.” Was this the plan? Did everything get thrown off right here? When that didn’t work, was Luke thinking, “Aw, crap, well now we are screwed”? Luke then tells Jabba he can either profit or be destroyed. Jabba, kind of understandably, reacts unfavorably to this demand and sends Luke down to the Rancor pit. Anyway, the end result is Luke gets captured. Now everyone but Lando is captured.

Okay, so what was this plan? Seriously. If you have a legitimate answer, I would like to know.

Everything culminates when Luke, Han, and Chewbacca are going to be thrown into the Sarlacc. Luke signals for R2-D2 to shoot him over his lightsaber – and after a dazzling backflip, Luke starts killing hard-working, blue-collar skiff guards. There’s no way this was “the plan.” Yes, Luke planed for his lightsaber to be with R2-D2, but there’s no way this was Luke playing three-dimensional chess, “And then, after I beat the Rancor, instead of killing us all right there on the spot, Jabba will send us to the Sarlacc and that’s where we make our move!” So let’s not try to pretend that what happened was “the plan.” There are way too many variables. And that would have to assume Leia knew her and Han would be captured after she unfroze him, which makes no sense. Speaking of that, what happens if those two had just walked out? Do we go back to Luke, “Hm, well this is good news you two escaped, but before all this Jabba had one of us and now he has three. Maybe we should have thought this plan through a bit more.”

So, back to that night at the bar, we did come up with one explanation and it’s the only thing that even starts to make sense, even though it still doesn’t make total sense: Luke, Lando, and Leia never once spoke to each other about rescuing Han. It’s just coincidence they were all there at the same time. Or if they did speak before, they all just said things like, “Well, you know, he was deserting us anyway. I think we should just forget about him,” as they secretly forged their own separate missions.

So Lando, on his own, gets a job as a skiff guard and is still casing out the place, playing all the angles and trying to decide the best time to make his move. This is when the droids show up, throwing everything off. And when we first see Lando, he kind of has a look on his face that says, “Well this is going to mess up everything.”

Leia and Chewbacca conspire, on their own, to infiltrate Jabba’s palace with the whole, “I brought you Chewbacca, so now let me hang out here and party,” plan. Leia is thinking she will unfreeze Han, which she does, then I guess figure out a way to help Chewbacca? And she had to be wondering what the hell C-3PO was doing there as Jabba’s interpreter.

Luke uses the droids as a decoy as a way to sneak his lightsaber into Jabba’s palace, which didn’t really seem to be needed because no one really checked him for weapons, but maybe he couldn’t rely on that not happening. Luke is thinking, “Okay, I’ll just cruise in there, do a mind trick, and we’ll get Han and the droids back and be out of there lickety-split. If there are any problems, R2-D2 will shoot me over my lightsaber.” Then Luke gets in front of Jabba, his mind trick doesn’t work, R2-D2 is nowhere to be seen, and for some reason, Leia is there as a prisoner.

This is the best explanation we could come up with. If you have a better one, please make it known. It’s been 35 years since Return of the Jedi came out, it’s time we knew, exactly, what was Luke’s plan?

You can contact Mike Ryan directly on Twitter.

do you like going to work? Me neither! See how I got around that and got paid too!



from Carlos B2 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/uproxx/features/~3/xWxgyM3Ke1A/
via carlosbastarache216.blogspot.com/